Don't Let Me Stop You

What the heck, you'll do what you want anyway.

Should the Tea Partiers Become a Party?

Posted by Dan Draney on April 2, 2010

Briefly, the answer is “No.” So why not?

First of all, the deck is stacked against “3rd party” challenges, due to the “winner take all” nature of things as well as the ballot access barriers set up by the main parties. These rules exist to greater or lesser degrees in every state in the country. Just getting onto the ballot in each state, and staying there, is costly in money and manpower. The two large parties have also written into the law some “free” taxpayer money for themselves, while simultaneously restricting private donations, making it difficult for “3rd parties” to raise money.

The experience of the last year has also destroyed the main argument in favor of a 3rd party, namely the claim that “there’s no difference between the Democrats and Republicans.” Since all the Washington levers of power passed to the Democrats, the country has had a vivid demonstration of what the Dems will do with unchecked power, and it’s much worse than most people expected. Meanwhile, the Republicans have done better than expected, admittedly a rather low bar. They have remained highly unified in the face of the steamroller trio of Congressional super majorities, a radical left administration, and MSM cheerleading for the Obama agenda. Despite the occasional wobbling, the Republicans rediscovered their principles, and their opposition has been a key factor in denying the Democrats even a fig leaf of “bipartisan support” to legitimize their radicalism.

It remains to be seen how sincere and how widespread this rediscovery actually is, but the Republicans have earned the benefit of the doubt for this cycle. If you’re not convinced yet, consider the consequences that even a successful 3rd party founding would entail.

Suppose that a new Tea Party Party was wildly successful. What would that look like?

In the 2010 balloting that might mean getting a third to a half of the votes from people opposing our current runaway freight train government. Certain result: victory for the statists. Best case scenario for proponents of this approach is that it also begins a collapse of the GOP, so that the new party becomes the “2nd” party and the GOP becomes the “3rd” party.

Although it’s quite unlikely to happen that fast (<< 0.1% chance), if at all, let’s assume that by 2012 the GOP is becoming marginalized nationally as the Tea Party Party (TPP) makes more and more inroads into what was formerly the GOP base and dissatisfied independents. So in the 2012 elections, let’s say the Tea Party Party gets half the former GOP and two-thirds of the sympathetic independents. Electoral result: the statists win again, and the GOP is on the way out. After that assume, again highly optimistically, that remaining GOP officeholders defect to the TPP (or the Democrats), and the GOP itself fades away completely before the 2014 elections. At that point the TTP represents the unified voice for a small government, Constitutional renaissance.

Yippee! Now look at the wreckage. Democrats have had unimpeded control of both houses of Congress from 2008 to 2014, but now we’re ready to strike back. Obama, facing a divided opposition won re-election with pluralities of both the popular vote and Electoral College. The window for repealing the healthcare takeover is closed, as it’s now become part of the “safe” status quo. The economy remains a mess, due to George Bush, deregulation and greedy businesses, of course. Media outlets for opposition voices have been curtailed by a new Fairness Doctrine.

In other words this extremely optimistic scenario is a disaster for the ideas we want to promote and a dream scenario for our opposition. Now how long would it be before the pure, principled leaders we elect with the new TPP fall victim to the same corruption that politicians of the other two parties do? No longer, really, than if we elected them as through the current two parties. So if you meet someone who is fiercely advocating this course, you might ask yourself if he/she is a moby.

UPDATED: Fixed link to definition of a moby.

4 Responses to “Should the Tea Partiers Become a Party?”

  1. ptg said

    Amen. Who will we blame if the TP movement decides it needs to field a candidate? The GOP leadership, thats who. Why let them alienate real conservatives while trying to woo undesirables into the GOP tent? If the GOP fails to incorporate the TP movement and to banish the ‘progressive’ RINOs, the party is condemned to lose.

    Its one thing to lose honorably because of a stance on solid party principles, quite another to lose because of stodgy allegiance to an old-fashioned party leadership that has proven to be a loser.

  2. Uncle Wiggily said

    Pretty good take-down of the whole “Third Party” trope, Dan. It seems unlikely that there is sufficient time for a true 3rd party to crystallize before the mid-term elections in November, so we should escape Armageddon in the near term. I am, however, considerably less sanguine about the 2012 go-round.

    I guess we’ll see ….

  3. Dan Draney said


    Indeed, it would already be too late to go the 3rd party route for 2010, although it almost seems like Michael Steele and the Keystone Kops at the RNC are shooting for that. 🙂


  4. […] Comments teapartysam on Faking RacismDan Draney on Should the Tea Partiers Become a Party?Uncle Wiggily on Should the Tea Partiers Become a Party?ptg on Should the Tea Partiers Become […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: