Don't Let Me Stop You

What the heck, you'll do what you want anyway.

Congress and the People

Posted by PLaplace on March 23, 2010

Reading on recently, I came across a link to this poll (2nd item, “Negative Words for Congress”) done by the Pew Research Center on the public’s impression of Congress.  The results are, to put it mildly, less than favorable.  While we all know that Congress’ approval ratings are perennially in the dumps, what fascinates me is people’s specific complaints.  In particular, the difference between what I would delineate as structural complaints (those having to do with the nature of Congress as a body) versus performance complaints (those having to do with Congressmen as legislators).

The structure of the poll was fairly simple; 749 people were asked to “provide the one word that best describes their current impressions of Congress.”  Given the wide variety of possible responses, the results were fairly scattered, but Pew published the list of the top 19 responses and their respective counts, totaling to 240 of the 749.  Splitting these into structural, performance, and neither, the totals become 111, 86, and 43, respectively.  Or, in more useful form, 46% of complaints are structural, 36% are performance, and 18% can’t be classified.

This reveals, I think, a fundamental misunderstanding of why Congress is built the way it is.  Congress is supposed to be “dysfunctional.”  It was designed under the idea that a legislative body so fractious would be incredibly difficult to operate without strong agreement across its members, and therefore (in theory) across the nation and the populace.  Hence, the rights of the minority would be protected, and the consent of the governed would be required.  That Congress sometimes can’t seem to get anything done is something we should be grateful for.  I for one sleep better when Congress isn’t in session.

Though the 46% number above is hardly a rigorous statistic, I feel it signals a certain ignorance about, or at least disagreement with, the basic foundations of our republic.   I can’t help but worry for the future of our country if 46% of us believe the problem is that Congress isn’t doing enough.

Notes on methodology:  For the above breakdown, I counted the following complaints as “Structural”: Dysfunctional, Inept, Incompetent, Ineffective, Sucks, Gridlock, Slow, Messy.  The following were “Performance”:  Corrupt, Self-serving, Lazy, Crooks, Disappointing, Idiots.  The rest I didn’t feel could easily be classified:  Confused, Bad, Poor, Lousy, Terrible.


2 Responses to “Congress and the People”

  1. Dan Draney said

    It’s an interesting analysis. Some of the nominally “structural” criticisms could be performance-related. For example the abject failure to exercise any control over spending growth, while enacting new, unaffordable entitlements could lead one to pick: dysfunctional, inept. or incompetent. While I agree that many people have forgotten that gridlock is by design, there are structural problems which are not by design. For example the ability of incumbents to perpetuate their own power by taxing Peter to buy the vote of Paul is a structural problem.

  2. Uncle Wiggily said

    I have long preached that gridlock in government is our friend; as long as we can keep that bunch of underachievers playing slap-and-tickle among themselves, they have much less time to root around in our lives, our affairs, and our wallets. My definition of a great day in Washington is when they are all out of town.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: